Further Debate Needed Around NHS Independence, King’s Fund, UK

April 26, 2007 – 7:52 pm | posted in Public Health

Commenting on article in the Financial Times (11 April 2007) about proposals to give the NHS greater independence, Niall Dickson, King’s Fund Chief Executive, said:

‘We welcome the debate around creating greater autonomy for the NHS and reducing political interference in day-to-day management of the health service.

‘The aim must be to liberate doctors, nurses and managers from stifling central control, but at the same time ensure that they are accountable for the services they commission and provide. In future, at a national level, we should be more concerned about the outcomes for patients and less about how local services are organised.

‘However it is not yet clear whether setting up an independent NHS board is the best way to achieve this. The day-to-day running of health services is already supposed to be in the hands of local managers and boards, and we also have a range of organisations at arms length from government, such as the Healthcare Commission and NICE, who monitor and regulate the system.

‘Therefore we do need further debate to clarify the respective roles of regulators, the Department of Health and parliament in taking decisions about funding, setting standards and defining the strategic objectives for health and health care. That may mean we can move to something more like an independent board at the centre but let us not rush into another ill-thought-through reorganisation. The NHS has seen too many of those already.’

The King’s Fund is an independent charitable foundation working for better health, especially in London. We carry out research, policy analysis and development activities, working on our own, in partnerships, and through funding. We are a major resource to people working in health and social care, offering leadership development programmes; conferences, seminars and workshops; publications; information and library services; and conference and meeting facilities.

Also Read

  • King’s Fund Comments On The Department Of Health’s Our NHS, Our Future, UK
  • Balance Needed In Electronic Tagging Debate, UK
  • Tracking Movements Of People With Dementia - Balance Needed In Electronic Tagging Debate, UK
  • King’s Fund Report Into Agenda For Change - UNISON Reaction, UK
  • The Question Is Not About The Government’s Aims For The NHS But About Its Methods For Achieving Them, Says King’s Fund, UK
  • Washington Post Examines Debate On Prescription Drug User Fees
  • Pain Affecting Older People Being Researched By The University Of Nottingham
  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court Ruling Revives Class-Action Lawsuit Against Independence Blue Cross
  • Lib Dems Right To Seek More Responsive NHS But Suggested Measures May Not Be Effective, Say King’s Fund, UK
  • Global Fund Must Fund Salaries Of Health Workers To Deliver HIV, TB, And Malaria Treatments
  • You must be logged in to post a comment.