Some Lawmakers, Policy Analysts Say Congress Is Unlikely To Change Health Care System, Propose Allowing States Instead To Develop Programs To Expand

November 29, 2006 – 3:43 pm | posted in Health Insurance, Primary Care

Federal lawmakers have introduced three bills that would “use states as laboratories … for expanding insurance coverage, improving quality and controlling costs,” the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports. According to the Journal Sentinel, the bills are “designed to get around Washington’s deadlock on health care reform” and “acknowledg[e] that there may not be one sweeping solution that works equally well in states as dissimilar as Massachusetts and Mississippi.” Although they differ slightly, each of the three bills would encourage states to propose health care reform plans, which would be reviewed by a commission or task force that would recommend the best ideas for fast-track approval by Congress. Sens. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) and Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) introduced the first bill in May. A second bill, introduced in July by Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), would fund a certain number of pilot projects that would be funded partially by states. That bill would cost a projected $32 billion over 10 years, which would be paid for by offsets. A House bill introduced in July by Reps. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Tom Price (R-Ga.) and two other co-sponsors would require that states’ projects produce no net cost to the federal government after five years. Comments
Supporters of the proposals maintain that state projects “might be the best hope for moving health care reform forward,” the Journal Sentinel reports. In addition, the concept “appeals to conservatives and liberals alike” and “recognizes that state have taken the lead in health care reform” so far, according to the Journal Sentinel. Feingold said, “It’s a way to break through the philosophical divide,” adding, “There’s no way this is going to get done with only state resources.” Len Nichols, director of the health policy program at the New America Foundation, said, “You’ve got to have federal resources,” adding, “But you’ve got to have state ingenuity. And that’s what this proposal calls for” (Boulton, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 11/26).

Also Read

  • State Lawmakers Nationwide Making Health Coverage Expansions Top Priority In 2007
  • Recent Editorials Address Medicare Trustees’ Report
  • Sen. Obama Seeking Public Input, Consensus As He Develops His Health Care Proposal
  • Senate Finance Committee Bans American Medical Association From Medicare Reform Bill Talks
  • States Look To Increase Number Of Insured Young Adults By Allowing Them To Stay On Their Parents’ Health Coverage Longer
  • Alaska Lawmakers Consider Universal Health Care Proposal
  • GAO Recommends Congress Focus On Establishing Medicare Pay-for-Performance System, Financial Oversight Of Medicaid
  • Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report Highlights Recent News Coverage Related To FY 2008 Budget
  • Congress In 2007 Expected To Debate Health Policy Issues Involving Medicare, Prescription Drugs, Uninsured
  • Lawmakers Should Not Reduce Funds For Medicare Advantage Program, BCBSA CEO Writes In Op-Ed
  • You must be logged in to post a comment.